RegalRealty-Poinciana-Banner-V1.gif

UDP collected most fees

cash-pile-thumb10747073.jpg(CNS): Each year since taking office the UDP administration has collected more cash for government coffers from duty, fuel and fee increases than any other administration, but every year it has also spent more. Even when compared to the financial year 2005-06, when significant duty was collected as a result of the Ivan reconstruction, revenue was still less than $500 million. This administration has squeezed the public and business community for more and more cash each year, and despite the cuts the premier says have been made to core government operating expenses, this financial year the bill will exceed a half billion dollars, with the community coughing up more than $590 milllion.

The taking and spending has also been higher when statutory authorities are taken into consideration, despite the assertion that this government is managing the public finances better than its predecessor. In addition, if government had paid into the past service liability for the civil service pension as the previous administration had done, things would be even worse.

Independent MLA Ezzard Miller said that the situation makes a mockery of the claims by Premier McKeeva Bush that his government’s main success has been managing public finances.

“Mr Bush keeps referring to the success of his government in the restoration of responsible financial management. That is utter rubbish,” the North Side member said. “It could not be further from the truth. No government in history has made the stupid and ignoramus decisions that have been committed by this administration.”

Miller said there had been considerable of abuse of processes by the government that are there to improve financial management and protect the public purse. He pointed to numerous situations of mismanagement, from the paving of private driveways in the Brac to the legal settlement to GLF, as well as the Cohen and Co controversy. 

In its first full year in office, in complete contrast to the budget it had presented to the Legislative Assembly, the UDP government collected over $502 million but then spent more than $517 million. The next year the government took in $525 million but spent well over $520 million. In the last financial year it collected an estimated whopping $535 million in revenue, but after coming back with appropriations of more than $50 million, once the figures are confirmed it is expected to have spent a massive $580 million.

When the budget was first drafted the public sector bill for 2012/13 was estimated to be around $660 million and it is this shocking figure that government has been trying to hone down to a manageable level since the start of the year.

Miller said that with record revenue collection but continued public sector increases, McKeeva Bush, who is also the minister of finance, could under no circumstances claim any credit for improving financial management.

The independent members said the people of Cayman could no longer put up with this type of poor governance, and called on every Caymanian to step up and save their country.

“It is time now for all Caymanians who are able, both young and old, to come forward to put an end to this bad governance and help save the country,” he said. Miller added that everyone needed to get involved, especially intelligent professional Caymanians, who were needed to run for office.

He asked others who did not want to join the political race to scrutinize more closely than ever before the behaviour of government representatives and demand more from them both now and in the future.

Comments

When the ppm spent...they

When the ppm spent...they spent on Schools, roads and govt headquarters...all these things will serve Cayman for the next 25 years at least....WHAT do the UDP have to show for spending more than the PPM...?.....LAWSUITS and LINING POCKETS

6
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

You forgot travelling the

You forgot travelling the world with family and friends.

0
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Check with planning.  I would

Check with planning.  I would imagine that we have developers running scared.  Wanting to get their projects approved before Mac loses control.  My question is why do they want ot do this at the "last hour" do they realize it would not happen in a "reasonable " government?

2
2
0
Troll
1
LOL

SIZE MATTERS

SIZE MATTERS

0
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

The people of the Cayman

The people of the Cayman Islands are equivalent to a heard of Cash Cows.
Big Mac & Co. are going to bleed us dry with their inability to STOP SPENDING MONEY THEY DON"T HAVE and WASTING the money they do.
Where Oh Where is the accountability?

8
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

How much can Mac spend in 9

How much can Mac spend in 9 months???

0
0
0
Troll
16
LOL

How much you got?

How much you got?

3
0
0
Troll
10
LOL

Thats more than a million

Thats more than a million dollars per head!

7
3
0
Troll
5
LOL

Huh? You reckon there are

Huh? You reckon there are only 590 people on these Islands?

0
0
0
Troll
4
LOL

we could have gotten more $$

we could have gotten more $$ if the govt never gave custom break on tart, shetty etc!
CB 

6
3
0
Troll
3
LOL

Are we ready for round two?

Are we ready for round two? Let's gear up to get them out. This slot machine government will bankrupt us all.

28
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

If you do the maths,

If you do the maths, they cost each of us roughly 12,000 a year, how many of us get 12,000 of value from this government!  They be trying to give some of it back to us not taking more.  Bottom line goverment costs to much and presents very little value for money.

16
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

McKeeva Bush just happens to

McKeeva Bush just happens to be in the position of Premier. The systems of heirarchy in government evolved to allow anyone who is made Premier to do exactly as Mr. Bush is doing. It is an all powerful position with many conflicts of interest and no checks and balances in place. The sad thing is that lawyers, MLA's and other high officials are able to uncover and bring to light misdeeds and wrongdoing and unacceptable actions but because the system is lacking in our ability to control this high position, we are at the mercy of whom ever holds the office of Premier regardless of his or her intentions and actions. This cannot be allowed to remain or we will eventually find ourselves back here in the future with a different tyrant or idiot, or socialist running amuk and taking us all down. The next government's first and foremost priority should be to re-invent our government systems to prevent what we are now seeing take place. We the voters are powerless for 4 years and can only influence government at the ballot box. Not even our Constitution has the ability to give us the power we need to rectify this situation. This must change,

58
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

I whole heartedly agree with

I whole heartedly agree with you.  The Constitution needs to change to provide more checks and balances.  Unfortunately, when it was done, the last thing politicians at the time wanted were people to have a restraining element over them and the people at the time never foresaw this situation as occuring.  Having experienced it, I hope we get a set of honest, ethical people in the next election who are not afraid to make the necessary changes.

4
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Please learn your

Please learn your constitutional power as voters: start a voter petition, gather signatures, and submit it - couldn't be easier.  You may have heard about the OMOV petition of earlier this year.  Perhaps you'd like to ask for the finance ministers/Speaker/Premier resignation?  Or ask for double dip pension scheme reform?  or pay cuts to MLAs?  Or you can close your eyes and pretend it's not happening and hope in vain for some change in May 2013.  It's all up to you Cayman.  The rest of us would hope you do not delay the changes you already know need to happen.  

27
0
0
Troll
4
LOL

Please explain. Our

Please explain. Our Constitution does not provide for the recall of elected officials. And no matter what referendums are put forth in the future, what is to keep government from hijacking them as was done with OMOV? Our Constutution is in its' infancy and already needs a major overhaul. Please explain how in its' current form it is of any use to the citizens of Cayman to stop the madness we are seeing.

5
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

This sounds like: 'It's not

This sounds like: 'It's not Bush's fault; they went and created this position of premier and that forced him to behave as he does. Any premier would do the same'. While the Constitution does need some more checks and balances Bush is the absolute worst case scenario for a premier. Some of the problem is simply a lack of will to vigourously pursue investigations. We do have an anti-corruption commission.   

31
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

We have an anti-corruption

We have an anti-corruption commission?  Where are they?  What do they do?
 

13
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

And, WHO are they? SHAME ON

And, WHO are they? SHAME ON THEM!!!

3
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

That's my point. There is no

That's my point. There is no end to the investigations.  

5
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

It seems to me these people

It seems to me these people come into government caring not a whit what happens during their tenure.  As long as they can collect their salaries, perks, and pensions 'tings is fine. The sad part is four years later after they've run their businesses, stuffed their pockets and done some travelling they're simply moved to the other side of the aisle for some much needed rest.
It's really quite a joke but a cruel one because many people suffer because of it.  The reality is...politics is the only occupation we know of where there is absolutely no accountability for one's actions and failures. The irony is the people who suffer also haved to pay for it with very few choices. Pick either one... and good luck!

40
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Will a bunch of young,

Will a bunch of young, educated, Caymanian graduates please step up to the plate and stand as independents to get rid of these two utterly useless parties that have been in power for way too long. It’s simple – government is collecting enough revenue, just stop wasting expenditure on stupid multi-million dollar projects which you hope is going to buy you votes!

52
3
0
Troll
0
LOL

...so long as the voters

...so long as the voters allow it to be so...and they do!

19
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Thats says it all really

Thats says it all really

12
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Silence is the endorsement of

Silence is the endorsement of the current level of oversight.  Where is the voter-initiated petition to remove/replace the standing finance minister?  With all the fire-in-the-belly talk, this has got to be the most apathetic electorate on Earth.  Even the opposition and independent menber are too afraid to initiate one?!?  Speaks volumes.  

32
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Speaking at two public

Speaking at two public meetings over the last few weeks the premier has said that government has gone as far as it can in terms of cuts and he will not sanction cutting civil service jobs. As a result he has turned to increases in revenue in order to arrive at a surplus budget.
It hasn't gone as far as it can, there are many, many other credible and sensible revenue-raising ideas that have already been suggested all over CNS and on other media, as well as by the various commercial stakeholders here that could be followed, even if he refused to cut CS jobs despite the fact that the government needs a complete overhaul including job and financial liability cuts.

41
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

In other words he is not up

In other words he is not up to the task at hand.   But He will have to be the one to do it?  So then Cayman is on its way to permanent failure with no real hope other than the UK stepping up in the near future.  Got it.  Pretty much what everyone (not in CIG) thought.  Now what?

21
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

The governments number one

The governments number one job is to pay salaries to half of the voters and welfare to the other half.  This is not going to stop until the golden goose is cooked. There is zero political will to change, and a total lack of understanding of the probable consequences of Cayman's utter financial irresponsibility.

42
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

Now with all this new

Now with all this new information watch as they try harder to hide the info and spend more.  Its what they do.  Its what is expected of them by those who put them in charge.  it is what it is.  Plan accordingly.

54
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Or change it!

Or change it!

17
0
0
Troll
4
LOL

Like Caymanians have been

Like Caymanians have been trying to for the last few years?  What did all that accomplish?  It got worse!  Demanding the premeir to turn from being a self serving idiot to a responsible and well trained proffessional might not be the best use of your time.  If you don't have an "A" game to bring better just stay home and hope the UK has the will power to fight the Caymanian corruption machine again.  Not likely Mate! Like I said earlier plan accourdingly.

8
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Surprised?   Really?

Surprised?   Really?

46
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

So we have to thank the PPM

So we have to thank the PPM for making substantial investments in our roads, schools, and the admin building. Had they not started those projects then we would have nothing to show for the taxes which this government collected.
The legacy of the UDP is that they collected the most taxes, spent the most on world tours, gave the most of our taxes to their supporters,  and spent the less on our infrastructure!
 

96
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

And don't forget we have the

And don't forget we have the PPM to thank for FREEDOM OF INFORMATION. I wonder if we would have an FOI law in place today if it had been up to Mckeeva? NO WAY JOSE.

11
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

But we did miss out on

But we did miss out on getting the 100-room Hurricane Hilton on the bluff and the Bell Tower to our christian clean hands heritage in George Town.

11
1
0
Troll
31
LOL

Did he actually use the word

Did he actually use the word ignoramus? haha!

33
0
0
Troll
12
LOL

That should be Honourable

That should be Honourable ignoramus.

7
0
0
Troll
29
LOL

OMFG what the hell is wrong

OMFG what the hell is wrong with our government. This is not sustainable. Get a new government in office as this one has clearly failed us and let's hope they stick to there promises to make changes unlike the empty promises Bush has given us over the years.

58
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

The policians are very

The policians are very comfortable with the way things are.  The voters have to initiate change.  

32
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

Geez I wonder if this is the

Geez I wonder if this is the problem !?

Time to make some cuts!

No seriously IT IS TIME!

46
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

I challenge Mr Miller to one

I challenge Mr Miller to one test. Why not make it legal for any resident of our islands to run for elected office? Surely Mr Miller realizes we need all hands on deck to survive the current situation. What is more important Mr Miller? 1. That an expat helped get the island back on track. or 2. A Caymanian was at the wheel while Cayman ran aground. XXXXX

33
32
0
Troll
2
LOL

To  Anonymous (not verified)

To  Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/14/2012 - 00:48.              You left out a couple of important choices,so here they are. 3) An expat was at the wheel while Cayman ran aground,or 4) A Caymanian was at the wheel when Cayman got back on track.

 

 

10
2
0
Troll
3
LOL

There are many Caymanians who

There are many Caymanians who are educated and capable of running these islands. Please do not assume that all Caymanians are like the elected members.
 
Mr. Miller acknowledged that there was a need for new representation in government and as far as I'm concerned Mr. Miller has shown a lot of traits of what it is to be a leader. Bare in mind that a leader does not have to know everything and make all the decisions like our current Premier thinks. A leader has to know how to motivate his/her colleagues and keep the team moving toward a goal. A leader is a visionary. I think we need more people like Ezzard Miller who is willing to go onto the radio, be vocal and hold himself accountable to whatever he says whether people like it or not.

20
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Can you name any country or

Can you name any country or territory which would allow an expat to run for office in its parliament? I thought not. Why on earth would we entrust this country to someone who has no permanent ties to these Islands and will have, at best, divided loyalties? There are many Caymanians who could do a far better job than McKeeva.    

32
4
0
Troll
1
LOL

Er, try the United Kingdom

Er, try the United Kingdom for starters!
A citizen of the Irish Republic can stand for the UK Parliament, as can a citizen of any of the 53 countries of the Commonwealth who has (or does not require) indefinite leave to remain in the UK .
But you may be right that there are plenty of excellent Caymanians out there who could do a far better job than McKeeva - they just need to come forward and run for office.
Even if non-Caymanians or recent Caymanians standing for office is a step too far, what about the vote? In the UK any British citizen, and any resident EU or Commonwealth citizen can register to vote from the day they arrive.  And don't say small islands are different: in the Isle of Man most new residents can vote as soon as they take up residence.  In Jersey you get the vote after living there just two years. 
Now THAT would soon stop the vote-buying: so many driveways, so little time ...

4
6
0
Troll
0
LOL

Surely you can understand

Surely you can understand that giving non-citizens the right to vote/stand for election is a very different matter where they constitute a small minority of the population (as they do in the UK)  than where they constitute the transient majority of the population. That is why the UK only gave British citizenship to BOTCs AFTER Hong Kong with its millions of people were returned to the Chinese and ceased to be a BOT.     

2
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

This is true, and not to

This is true, and not to agrue with your point about there being many Caymanians who could do a better job than McKeeva, but that's setting the bar pretty low, don't you think?  I would argue that there are plenty of expats who could not only do a better job than Mac, or any of the current batch of elected representatives, but could actually fulfil the demands to the level needed.
Right now, Cayman is fumbling around because it has a very small talent pool and you not only have elected dolts, the upper ranks of the civil service is littered with them as well. This isn't to say there are not some very capable Caymanians in high positions, but that some of those people are very underqualified for what they are doing. They got there only because of the entitlement culture and the country is paying the price now.
What if you made the criteria citizenship for running for elected office.  In the US for example, only the president has to be native born.  Non-US born citizens have become governors, senators, congressmen, state supreme court justices and even secretary of the state, one of the highest offices in the land.
The US has a talent pool of hundreds of millions of people and still the people sometimes choose foreign-born citizens because they think they can do a better job.  Here, with as small of a population pool as small as it is, people are either a) arrogant enought to think native-born Caymanians are smarter and more capable than all non-native born Caymanians; b) entitled to the benefits of being native born, so the country's best interests are not a factor; or c) so xenophobic that they just don't care who runs the place or how badly, just as long as it's not some damn foreigner.  Any of those answers is a path to ruin in the long run. 

12
8
0
Troll
0
LOL

1. You misquoted me. I said

1. You misquoted me. I said they could do "a far better job". No, that is not setting the bar too low. The implication of your post is that there are no Caymanians capable of doing the job required. That is nonsense. 
2. Contrary to popular belief the Constitution does not require candidates to be native born. One must however be fully naturalised and renounce any other citizenship. I can parse it for you if you wish.
3.  I would venture to say that there are no Caymanians arrogant enough to think native-born Caymanians are smarter and more capable than all non-native born Caymanians. Judging from many posts on CNS, however, it is clear that the opposite cannot be said - that there are no expats arrogant enough to think that non-native born Caymanians are smarter and more capable than all native born Caymanians.  

10
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

My original post certainly

My original post certainly didn't imply "there are no Caymanians capable of doing the job required"; It simply implied there aren't enough of them. I agree that there are a good number of Caymanians who could do a far better job of running the country that McKeeva Bush. but I would still maintain that even "far better" is not saying a lot with regard to McKeeva. The problem is, most are in the private sector making a ton of money and enjoying not being in the political fray on a day-to-day basis. Considering the state of things now, maybe some will stand for the next election. There are also some bright and capable Caymanians in civil service, but the problem is that anyone who stays there too long is ruined, a least when it comes to proper governance, by the experience.
The main point I was trying to make is that Cayman would be wise to utilise some of the expatriate talent in government, if some expat was so inclined to offer it. Cayman has attracted some very capable talent. If they US utilises foreign talent in government even though they have more than 300 million residents to choose from, what's wrong with Cayman (which only has maybe 20,000 native born citizens) doing the same?
Fair enough on your second point, but I was responding to your "name any country or territory which would allow an expat to run for office in its parliament" comment. If you're saying that a person who becomes a naturalised citizen and denounces any other citizenship is no longer an "expat" then you are correct. But you have to admit, in the eyes of most Caymanians, once and expat, always an expat, and that even applies to some people because their parents were both expats, even though they  were born here and lived  their whole lives. Of course, this is all moot because no former expat will get elected for at least for another generation. Single member constituencies could bring on the change a little faster, but I would think it will take at least 20 more years before an expat or the child of an expat couple has a real chance of being elected here.
I think there are people on both sides - Caymanians and expats - who think their particular tribe is smarter and more capable than all the people in the other tribe. Cayman is not unique in that regard.  Neither position is correct, and that's the problem with speaking in generalisations. But I baited you on that one (even if it were done so in the form of a theoretical choice of options) so, as the kids say, my bad. Sometimes the anonymity aspect of this forum induces my mischievous side.

5
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

Pure garbage!  Who knows a

Pure garbage!  Who knows a country better than the people who was born and raised in that country? 

8
9
0
Troll
1
LOL

Post new comment

You must be logged in if you are using your real name
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Note: the editor toolbar is avaible to registered users.
Read the CNS comment policy
Become a registered user
Login
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.