RegalRealty-Poinciana-Banner-V1.gif

Photographer presents a ‘wormhole’ to the past

Jr gallery (238x300).jpg(CNS): A new photographic exhibition at the National Gallery presents a new and interesting take on Cayman with a merging of the old and the new. In "Now & Then" Courtney Platt takes archive photographs and merges them with modern day shots taken from the same perspective. The result goes beyond nostalgia and is haunting in its recollection of the ‘islands that time forgot’ and its way of life. Schooners merge with helicopters and modern offices push their way into quiet street scenes. Platt describes the unique pictures as "wormholes to the past" and the creation of the exhibition as an incredibly moving experience.

“Past and current landmarks, buildings, events and generations of people blend together in a surreal and at times haunting mixture of imagery, “ said Natalie Urquhart, the gallery’s director. “They evoke a way of life that is rapidly becoming confined to memory and remind us of the importance of preserving our unique heritage before it is lost.”

The exhibition uses archive footage from the Cayman Free Press Steinmetz Collection and is open at the Gallery on Esterley Tibbetts Highway until 11 December.

Comments

I don't know about UNIQUE per

I don't know about UNIQUE per say...
http://wagefellow.tumblr.com/image/30925430342 San Francisco (from 2010)

1
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Is there a charge to get in,

Is there a charge to get in, and how much? 
Does anybody know?
 
CNS: It's free

2
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

There was no charge on

There was no charge on Saturday...

0
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Great job Courtney

Great job Courtney

6
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

We went to this Saturday, and

We went to this Saturday, and I have to say I found it really interesting, unique almost and it give a very artistic take on the "old" and "new" Cayman. I would recommend you go before it shuts...

11
3
0
Troll
0
LOL

How many pictures are there

How many pictures are there approximately?
Last time I went there, for a different event, there was only 10 pictures.

5
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

Was that the Pissaco

Was that the Pissaco exhibition? Personally I had never heard of him.

0
1
0
Troll
7
LOL

I did not count, but I would

I did not count, but I would say closer to 30. The writings besides the pictures are intersting too. Took us about 45 to go around. I dont think you will be disappointed. And no, I don't work there. And no, I am not Courtney.

2
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Thank you, really appreciate.

Thank you, really appreciate. I will make my way there on Saturday.
 

0
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Are you his Mum?

Are you his Mum?

0
1
0
Troll
7
LOL

Wasn't even a woman the last

Wasn't even a woman the last time I looked, but these days...who knows??

0
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Are you his Dad then?

Are you his Dad then?

0
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Apparently quantity is

Apparently quantity is significant when it comes to art.

0
1
1
Troll
11
LOL

It's not that quantity

It's not that quantity counts. I just don't think a 25 to 30 min drive is worth to look at only 10 pictures.
It was just a normal question, didn't meant to offend nobody.

3
5
0
Troll
2
LOL

So "yes", quantity is

So "yes", quantity is apparently a factor.  Philistine! The National Gallery had the chance of showing a Van Gogh or two, but the curator declined the offer on the basis "well there was only one or two paintings on offer for the show, and our visitors think it is really not worth a 25 minute drive to see that few exhibits".

0
0
0
Troll
4
LOL

Post new comment

You must be logged in if you are using your real name
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Note: the editor toolbar is avaible to registered users.
Read the CNS comment policy
Become a registered user
Login
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.