PRs proposed for jury duty
(CNS): The government is considering expanding the jury pool to include people who cannot vote. A new bill proposes to add permanent residents and Caymanian status holders (with or without naturalisation) as well as reducing the list of exempted professions and people. Members of the public are being asked to submit comments to the Attorney General’s Office for the Judicature Amendment Bill 2011, which suggests widening the list of persons eligible to serve as jurors in the Cayman Islands courts beyond the registered voters list. At this year’s official opening of the Grand Court the chief justice had drawn attention to the difficulties of finding people to serve on juries because of fear of intimidation or worse.
Rather than attempting to eliminate jury trials, as law enforcement officials had suggested last year, Chief Justice Anthony Smellie suggested that expanding the pool would be a more appropriate and just solution.
He said the legal profession was advising that the roll of jurors be widened from the voters list at present to include all adult persons lawfully resident in the Islands. “This would not only greatly increase the number of potential jurors, it would also spread all the burdens and responsibilities of jury duty across that wider base,” the country’s top judge had stated. “And it follows, there would be even less to be gained for those with criminal intentions in seeking to intimidate jurors, if they were assured that the society at large refuses to be intimidated.”
There are only 15,267 people on electoral list, which is just over a quarter of the current population of almost 55,000 people, as revealed by the preliminary census results earlier this month. From those who are eligible as voters, people over sixty are excluded as well as doctors and lawyers and even poor people, reducing the available pool by thousands.
Currently the governor, politicians, magistrates and justices of the peace, recognised pastors and ministers of religion, people working at the courts, medical practitioners, police officers and registrars are exempted, as well as those who can’t attend by reasons of poverty. People previously convicted before any court of an offence for which they were sentenced to prison and who have not received a pardon also cannot serve.
Officials are now considering removing some of the exemptions as well as including all permanent residents and increasing the current age limit from 60 to 70 years old. Lawyers too are being considered for inclusion, exempting only those attorneys who are actively engaged in litigation. The proposed bill further suggests remove the exemption for medical practitioners, registrars of land, births, marriages and death and those exempted by reason of poverty.
While the suggestion to widen the pool has been welcomed in some quarters of the community as a sensible solution, in particular increasing the age limit and removing some of the professional exemptions, the suggestion of adding permanent residents to the pool has, however, raised the question of their lack of democratic rights. The responsibility of serving on a jury works, in most democratic jurisdictions, hand in hand with the right to vote.
Anyone wishing to add their thoughts to the bill still being drafted should contact Tesia Scott in the Attorney General's Chambers, 4th Floor, Government Administration Building or by email tesia.scott@gov.ky by Friday, 6 May.
See draft amendment bill below.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 20110329145536481.pdf | 84.4 KB |
Viewpoints
-
Wendy Ledger(Read more)36
-
Lorna Bush(Read more)121
Latest Forum Topics
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent Comments
- Wow...
That means 90 percent
2 days 51 min ago - Sorry everyone, Richard wrote
2 days 55 min ago - And here are my favourite
2 days 59 min ago - He must be stopped! If
2 days 1 hour ago - I have no problem with Dart
2 days 1 hour ago - Apparently something like
2 days 1 hour ago - The PPM Government? There has
2 days 1 hour ago - That is only accepted by the
2 days 1 hour ago - I have to say that I find it
2 days 1 hour ago - The Caymanian ruling class is
2 days 1 hour ago
Latest Classifieds
- 2Bed/2.5Bath Townhouse for Rent
- 2Bed/2.5Bath Townhouse for Rent
- Juror's notice
- 96 Honda Orthia - $1,650 OBO
- Play Online Games and Make Genuine Money 100% free. (P0-50141)
- Missing English Bull Dog 'MAX
- Luncheon at Windsor Castle
- Home needed
- UCCI Gospel Concert
- Cayman Heart Fund Discovery Day 5K, Ken Chand Walk/Run
Search
Join Our Mailing List




Comments
A question to the brilliant
Sounds like a good idea to
Is this idea at having
Re: Fear of intimidation,
Re: Fear of intimidation, friends or family ties will no longer have an effect when a group of jury members with PR hear a case.”
Unless you’re a criminal, you don’t need to fear me. I’ll be the first person to defend your civic rights, inside and outside the courtroom, because it’s the right thing to do. In fact, criminals attempting to intimidate me into not protecting your rights might find it to be an expensive and inconvenient exercise. Crime must always be an unprofitable business.
If I was in charge, criminals would not be terrorizing residents or visitors.
You appear to be suggesting that those with PR are humans with morals superior to all the natives in this polity you want to join... Maybe you will understand how meaningless the term “Caymanian” is becoming, when you become one. Or perhaps, your goals are purely financial and you will have your own “ties”…, regardless of whether the term “Caymanian” means anything or not.
A non-Caymanian without voting rights, do not and should not ever have a right to sit as juror. When you become Caymanian with the right to vote, I will happily defend your right to be a juror.
This is simply a political trick to weaken the voice of the natives at the General Elections in 2013 and beyond. Caymanians make sure you know what your MLA’s personal views are on this matter, because that is the position he or she will most likely support in the LA.
Never heard more nonsense
1. The same people always
You are so right! It is
One other matter for sure
Get rid of the jury system
It follows that a person who
PR holders do not possess
I feel that this is well
Before you start advocating
On first take I thought it
you r absolutely right, but u
No vote no rights, no Jury
I did jury duty 4 years ago.
I did jury duty 4 years ago. Am a status holder but not naturalised????
I am delighted to see this
I only wish the same of what
I only wish the same of what has taken place, is taking place, and is being proposed to take place in the future in this country could for a single year be introduced into a country like say ... Britain - actually, add Germany and Austria to that list.
Lol!
I kid you not - Europe would be nothing but a smouldering lump of rock! They would burn that place down to the ground by way of rioting, protests and uproar!
Many love to come on here and voice all sorts of crap, knowing full well that it would be HELL TO PAY is the same was to take place in their own country.
Honestly - can you imagine if Britain had to deal with a 50/50 immigration statistic?! Especially considering that their new fellow residents did not look like them or share their "cultural values"?!
Lol!
Look at what is taking place in Europe right now people - it is to the point where the highest elected officials have FINALLY bent to the true nature and will of the people and have uttered sentiments very close in nature what has traditionally been deemed as disgusting, xenophobic and even racist.
The entire debacle is even more outrageous when one examines exactly how small a minority of (emigrated) people represent the point of contention.
Can we kindly bear these things in mind as we post your offerings and opinions on issues such as the ones being raised in this thread.
@ The posters below: Laugh
@ The posters below:
Laugh it up.
After all, what else can one do when faced with discomforting truth?
It is what it is folks.
You must all be so very proud.
:o)
WHODATIS You spurt forth
sometimes? how about all the
sometimes? how about all the time... The Beaver
But, Flossy, at least he
Anonymous 03/31/2011 -
How much do I have to pay to
How much do I have to pay to be exempted?
Something to think about. PR
smh!!!
smh!!!
Dennie, why you shaking your
Dennie, why you shaking your head?
Because the disrespect law
Because the disrespect law makers have for Caymanians is getting worse.
I think it is a disgrace that
Voter registration status has
I've been a registered voter
I've been a registered voter for the past 17 years and not once have I been called for jury duty...not once! Yet I know of persons who are called repeatedly. I believe the problem has nothing to do with the numbers that are available but more with the selection process. I do not agree with allowing non voters to serve as jurors.
Can't vote, can't stand for
This proposal is but only one
This proposal is but only one step towards the goal of giving non-Caymanians the right to vote and who knows what else... Only after they becoming a voter should it be possible for them to be a juror.
Ok, so I'm not good enough
I think you need remedial
A good idea. And about time.
I welcome this idea. I've
I welcome this idea. I've been here for over 15 years and have my Caymanian status. I've not been naturalized and cannot yet vote, but I certainly know enough about the islands (all three) to serve on a jury.
I am a white collar upstanding member of the community, married to an upstanding 6th generation Caymanian.
I work with three well known charities, volunteer my time and services in our community, and would be the right choice as a juror. I am honest and fair (and have to say this...."I don't CARE if "HE" was a good boy when he was 12 yrs old and know his mamma, if you are caught in a crime and I am on the jury, you WILL DO TIME.)
You need to go to Mac with
You need to go to Mac with some of your ideas. lol. I always thought that the jury was supposed to determine guilt or innocence, NOT sentence them. But this could dovetail nicely with Mac's ideas about criminals not being entitled to legal aid. We could get rid of the judges as well, and just have a jury find them guilty and issue the sentence immediately.
Wow....Impartial much????
Wow....Impartial much???? NOT!!
Post new comment