Cruise port scales down
(CNS): As plans for the development of the George Town cruise berthing facilities move ahead with a new partner, the chair of the Port Authority has said that it now has a very different scope from that proposed by Dart. Local contractor Royal Construction with its partner, marine contractors GLF, is planning a scaled down proposal that will be financed on cruise fees rather than through an expansive upland element. DECCO, Dart’s contractor, pulled out of project at the end of last year after the developer was unable to reach an agreement with government over the terms of the lease, on which it was intending an extensive upland development that would finance the whole project.
As the Royal/GLF proposal is considerable less complex or ambitious, focused on the two cruise piers – four berthing docks -- and an upland terminal, costs are expected to be considerably less than $150 million. This means the contractors will in turn have a considerably smaller shortfall to make up between the cost of the project and the cruise lines guaranteed passenger fees. Although it is not yet certain how the contractor will make up the shortfall, passenger arrivals are likely to far exceed the figures which the cruise lines would be able to guarantee as a result of the increase in cruise passengers generated by the development.
Chair Stefan Baraud told CNS that negotiations with the cruise lines were now going well as they are all very keen for the Cayman Island to take on this project and develop the facilities. With substantially different plans, the contractors will also be looking at the design and construction methods for cost savings on the original estimates in order to get the basic berthing facilities and terminal completed in the first instance.
“Significant progress has been made and the contractor is moving at a pace that makes me confident that the project will be underway this year,” Baraud added. He said the next major milestone was on 17 February when the new plans for the berthing docks will be tested at the Star Centre in Fort Lauderdale on the simulation, mock-up in various weather conditions and circumstances.
The other major issue is the Environmental Impact Assessment. The chair said that Royal/GLF are already talking to the Department of Environment and the next stage will be to see if the work done by Dart is relevant and sufficient for this particular development. Baraud said that as yet the EIA which was undertaken by Dart has not been handed over as there are still commercial issues relating to that.
Without the deep pockets of Dart, the Royal/GLF partnership will be securing outside financing in order to begin the project, which the chair said should be in place before the end of next month and if all goes well with the simulation exercise and the EIA, the change in developer does not mean a dramatic change in time line and Baraud said he is still anticipating that the project will break ground this summer.
Getting the construction underway would be a significant boost, not just for the local tourism industry but the construction sector as well, as the developer estimates there could be as many as 200 jobs going for local people.
Viewpoints
-
Nicky Watson(Read more)5
-
101(Read more)18
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent Comments
- What progress?
5 hours 46 min ago - Unfortunately that was true
5 hours 47 min ago - But according to Mac, if you
5 hours 50 min ago - Need I remind you all that
5 hours 52 min ago - Looks like you were wrong!
5 hours 52 min ago - Yes, you are right. he owns
5 hours 53 min ago - What this country need for
5 hours 55 min ago - While I am in complete
5 hours 56 min ago - I ain't gonna wake him up!
5 hours 57 min ago - Hopefully one difference will
5 hours 59 min ago
Search




Comments
I guess it be like that
I guess it be like that borrowed loan that fell thru!
The only part of this that
The only part of this that bothers me is. "Now they will seek financing".
I am a bit lost how a company can be awarded a contact to build something when they don't have the financing in place... to build it.
I applaud the efforts and support the port, but just think it's a little late in the game to be shopping for cash.
It has always been Mac's
It has always been Mac's intent to have the FCA facilitate the berthing facilities through a surcharge to the passengers, I can't imagine why anyone would thing that had changed.
Giving credit where due this
Giving credit where due this appears to be sensible. Not sure why the huge sope of the previous developer was even considered. However, it is interesting that it appears that the developers are making proposals instead of building what the Government requests.
delays, delays,
If Mr. Baraud is succesful in
If Mr. Baraud is succesful in getting the project started it would mean there should be no need for an EE port project. We would have meg yachts and cruise ships in town.
Well now, that would depend
Well now, that would depend on the nature of the scale down, wouldn't it? (vis-a-vis the megayacht port.) -- Not, of course, that megayachts are a rationale excuse for a whole in EE or a channel in the North Sound either.
Venue: a run-down secret
LOL... poor PPM... the
The Chairman was right in
The Chairman was right in what he said about Decco's start date in the first quarter. If Decco was still the developer the project would be underway now. Unfortunetly it was Government and not the port board who cancelled Decco's agreement because of a long term lease.
It was a smart move by
It was a smart move by Government when you think how long the lease was
To bad Chuckie, I thought you
Dufus you drank the kool aid
We need this so much for our
No, No, it doesn't look any
No, No, it doesn't look any more positive than it ever did. This is still going to be a zit on Cayman's face.
Lets hope things get started
Actually, none of those
Actually, none of those people are depending on this. They are banking on it in order to make more money, but they are not depending on it. Or did you not notice the report on the increasing tourism numbers, without the new dock. If Cayman was serious about tourism we would be working on the stay over market (a lot more money in to the pocket of those bussinesses you site than they get from cruisers). However, if Cayman really looked at the costs and benefits of projects and published them, well, the emperor would get laughed at.
I understand this is a
What a waste? What do we need
What a waste? What do we need this for? God gave us a beautiful natural harbour in the North Sound and created dredging equipment with which we can make it deeper. I say dig the channel wide and deep enough to not only allow the mega yachts in but the cruise ships as well. Might as well kill two birds with one rock stone. The cruise piers need to be in the North Sound.
I agree, get it done and get
Great News on the progress
Great News on the progress being made! Lets get the project going.
Hopefully this means the
according to mr. baraud
How about taking a look at
How about taking a look at "The Western Cruise" itinerary Mr. Baraud???
Just simply go to Roatan and see what was built there very quickly and without great expense. They also have DIRECT flights from Europe eatig up the tourism competition.
This does not have to be another jobs for boys contract!
Cozumel also has a better cruise ship port......I went on the Western Caribbean Cruise itinerary on a high end ship and the only BAD port was Cayman. We have a better island, worse port.
more flip-flops, delays and
more flip-flops, delays and u-turns...... maybe after 2 years of negotiation, mr. baraud should re-consider his position....
Hey, at least after 15 years
Yes, for 15 years the greedy
Yes, for 15 years the greedy light in their eyes has been shining as they cried that they would be out of business without Government putting massive resources into an unsightly boondogle for them. But the facts have not born them out. Why do you believe them now? is it just that if something is repeated often enough it must be true, even if there is no evidence to back it up?
now you're attacking my
Please include a few mega
Please include a few mega yacht docking spots so that we don't have to build another huge facility somewhere else (damaging that much more of our natural environment in the process).
Post new comment