Talks stay secret
(CNS): The second round of negotiations with the UK on a new Cayman Islands Constitution open tomorrow, but besides the opening session and the concluding session, the four day talks will, once again, be held behind closed doors. Beginning Tuesday, 13 January, through until Friday, 16 January, daily, they will take place at the Westin Casuarina Resort, Leader of Government Business Kurt Tibbetts said.
“The format will include an opening session wherein all participants are welcome to deliver an introductory statement,” he said. “This session will be open to the public and the media and a final concluding session on Friday morning will also be open to the public and media.”
Viewpoints
-
101(Read more)36
-
Wendy Ledger(Read more)113
Latest Forum Topics
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent Comments
- In the interests of the
51 min 16 sec ago - But WHERE did the TV station
1 hour 1 min ago - There is only one adjective
1 hour 5 min ago - EC, what are you saying? Old
1 hour 7 min ago - Huh?? Huh???
1 hour 18 min ago - Congratulating harm on
1 hour 21 min ago - I do not wonder why the
1 hour 23 min ago - if someone is out to kill
1 hour 23 min ago - Cayman is a circus to those
1 hour 31 min ago - My dear Hmm, comment posted
1 hour 32 min ago
Search
Join Our Mailing List




Comments
Negotiations on our
Negotiations on our Constitution should be held in Public (the public should know what sordid proposals are being made by the HRC, the PPM or the UDP etcetera), and whether another country has their meetings in Public is irrelevant.
PPM is going out the door!!!
Maybe PPM was misled by the
Maybe PPM was misled by the UK into believing that the Constitutional negotiations would be held in Public. We know that the PPM was misled about the Cayman Islands having a "blank paper" in the negotiations.
Its seem that the People of the Cayman Islands truly have a Government they can trust, the problem now if that the PPM can only be trusted to be misled!
I don't anyone said, or
I don't anyone said, or believed, that Cayman would have a "blank paper" in the negotiations. As far back as 1999 the UK set out its checklist for Constitutional Modernization.
What I love about this is the same person who lambasted Minister Chuckie for leaking confidential information is now leaking confidential information! He says it is in the public interest, but so did Minister Chuckie. Some might speculate that Minister Chuckie did it for political expediency, others might say the same about Mr. Bush. Isn't it funny how some times the rules matter and sometimes they don't? Politricks!
The PPM needs to create its
The PPM needs to create its own dictionary! - I would have thought that their promises of "transparency" "open Government" "Government in the Sunshine" would have allowed these important discussions to be held in Public, but rather they are, most ironically, attacking McKeeva for releasing the draft document. Wow! I hope they put that dictionary in their 2009 Manifesto - i am dying to see what they meant when they said "taking the Country back"
I think the last post was
I think the last post was already answered already by the first one. However, I should point out that the UK has the say as to whether the negotiations are open or closed, not the PPM. The PPM is simply abiding by the rules. Isn't it funny that UDP says it does not wish anything the Governor does as the Queen's representative to be subject to review but yet it now defies the express directions of the UK Govt. itself! Is this what you mean by "taking the country back"? I thought the UDP was against independence. The "D" in UDP stands for "disingenuous". You can't fool all the people all the time.
The talks are CONFIDENTIAL. I
The talks are CONFIDENTIAL. I have yet to see anyone provide evidence of negotiations between countries being held in public. Amazing how the UDP are so "open", yet the previous talks they held in London on this subject were not in the public domain, but now they say that these talks should be. If not for the then opposition PPM, no NGO's would have been involved in those talks either. Short memories I guess.
WHY are they confidential?
WHY are they confidential? Maybe we could get a Minister to smuggle the papers out to us " in the interest of the people". We have one trained in that already.
Post new comment