McTaggart takes on Cayman slight in UK commons
(CNS): Despite the departure of Anthony Travers, Cayman Finance is keeping up with the work he started. Interim Chairman Roy McTaggart has sent a letter to Ronnie Campbell, MP (left), a UK parliamentarian who referred to the Cayman Islands as a tax haven during a debate in the House of Commons on Wednesday. In the letter he says that Campbell is doing a disservice to his constituents, given the enormous economic benefits UK companies gain by using Cayman when he inaccurately describes the islands as a tax haven. Delivering the same message as his predecessor, McTaggart says Cayman is a fully transparent jurisdiction and not a place where individuals or corporations are able to “hide money”.
During his comments in the UK parliament Campbell, the Labour MP for Blyth Valley, said he was sick of hearing the argument that there was no money in the UK government’s coffers. “Does my right hon. Friend not agree that, if all the multinational companies, including the banks, paid the tax on their profits instead of avoiding doing so by hiding their money in tax havens such as the Cayman islands, we would not have this problem? We would have bags of money-billions of pounds,” he said.
In his letter McTaggart, who took up the role only this week, said the statement was factually inaccurate and that UK-based multinational companies and corporate structures that are domiciled in the Cayman Islands have done so legally and in compliance with their domestic tax laws.
“This model allows these companies to make the most efficient use of capital held in the UK, thereby creating employment and wealth for your constituents,” McTaggart wrote. “The tax neutral platform which the Cayman Islands provide to international financing transactions has nothing whatsoever to do with the issue of tax evasion. Cayman Island entities pay taxes in the jurisdictions where the profits are made in accordance with the laws of those jurisdictions.”
He pointed out that the responsibility for the ability of UK companies to use Cayman remained with UK tax laws.
See McTaggart's letter below.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Letter to The Hon Ronnie Campbell from Cayman Finance.pdf | 181.89 KB |
Viewpoints
-
Lorna Bush(Read more)105
-
Ezzard Miller(Read more)26
Latest Forum Topics
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent Comments
- ...BESIDES your unecsessary
15 hours 48 min ago - Well, at least my comments
16 hours 7 min ago - This so called "vote" will be
16 hours 11 min ago - Therefore all the other
16 hours 39 min ago - The Caymanian people are so
16 hours 48 min ago - So this is about McKeeva but
16 hours 52 min ago - Keep it coming, CNS. The
17 hours 1 min ago - Told you so! Cant even get
17 hours 22 min ago - Speaking of land.
WHY DID THE
17 hours 29 min ago - Unbelievable at some of the
17 hours 30 min ago
Latest Classifieds
- Play Online Games and Make Genuine Money 100% free. (P0-50141)
- Missing English Bull Dog 'MAX
- Luncheon at Windsor Castle
- Home needed
- UCCI Gospel Concert
- Cayman Heart Fund Discovery Day 5K, Ken Chand Walk/Run
- Unity Rally and Appreciation Day
- Elegant Ladies Shoes
- House For Sale
- Affordable House within walking distance to the Sea!
Search
Join Our Mailing List





Comments
Cayman is the "cat to kick"
"given the enormous economic
The soapbox can be a tipsy
The soapbox can be a tipsy little pedestal. Mr. Campbell ought to be very careful of the precarious situation of his own. If elected government officials spent more time learning about the nature and the implications of their statements, rather than billing the tax payer for personal luxuries, he wouldn't be called out like this.
Google Ronnie and find this article - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5315001/Ronnie-Campbell-agrees-to-repay-6000-for-furniture-at-London-flat-MPs-expenses.html.
He makes a mockery of Government and only reasserts the need to have less Government (and therefore lower taxes needed to pay for it) rather than more.
Post new comment