Where should the cruise berthing facilities be located?

My preference of location is GT. On your second point what's the difference?  Most have to pay for a bus ride in town anyway as all the main stores, bars and eating places are miles out of town, as are the beaches and tourist attractions.
Perhaps therein lies the problem.  Its not just the lack of port facilities when they step off the ship, its the lack of tourist product.  What is there to tempt them to stay in the capital?  Have you seen how bored and lost the tourists look as they wander  vacantly round the capital asking where everything is?  Most are looking for shopping malls/stores and somewhere to eat/drink not just diamonds, watches, perfume and souvenirs.  Making GT into a thriving pedestrian shopping and dining centre, with adequate parking facilities, using meters if neccessary, could benefit us all.  It most definitely has an existing customer base with everyone who works in GT.  The proposed park was also a good thing I think.  However, I would prefer no busks and monuments -  I would rather see a simple, pleasant, traditional park with shaded green areas with benches and cabanas, perhaps a fountain or water feature or two, and lush gardens such as can be found at the Botanical Gardens.  Nothing extravagant or expensive, but something we can all use, visitor or not, for relaxation and leisure.

22

30

10

LOL

I have seen nothing that indicates what the cruise lines want as to location. Secondly if the new port were in the Red Bay area are we really expecting the passangers to pay for a bus ride to town?? Let's remember who the persons are that in the final analysis are paying for the facility and make it an enjoyable experiance for them.

16

28

8

LOL